![loom vs screencastify loom vs screencastify](https://gdm-catalog-fmapi-prod.imgix.net/ProductScreenshot/3611f910-f395-40eb-98f3-5ba51b132045.png)
![loom vs screencastify loom vs screencastify](https://krustation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/3-1-918x420.jpg)
One thing that I love about Loom's interface is that it keeps the controls front and center so you can easily pause, restart, and end the recording. Loom has a circle for the webcam in the screen recording which is much more appealing than Screencastify's rectangle. The differences are pretty superficial to start. I love that both of them have Chrome extensions, so I can start recording super easy! And they are both super easy to use as because they access the mic and camera with a click of a button. However, earlier this year, a coworker told me about Loom, so I thought I would look into it! I have been doing this for a while and have been using Screencastify for years.
#LOOM VS SCREENCASTIFY 720P#
The video recorded on 720p on Loom occupied 17.6MB, whereas the same video recorded on 1080p on Screencast-O-Matic took only 3.4MB.Because we are all teaching online now, I think we are all becoming more familiar with screen recording and making videos for our students. I recorded Chrome’s new tab with muted sound for 24 seconds in both.
#LOOM VS SCREENCASTIFY FULL#
On 720p, Screencast-O-Matic does not record the full screen.īy keeping the above concerns in mind, I went ahead, and the results surprised me. Another issue is that Loom free only supports recording at 720p, but Screencast-O-Matic supports 1080p. Video sizeĬomparing the video size is tricky as elements such as screen colours, audio level, and graphics play a part. Considering it is a cloud-based tool, the size is pretty large. Screencast-O-Matic on Windows takes about 72MB of storage, whereas Loom occupies about 300MB. You don’t get computer audio, 4K recording, and custom recording dimensions on the Windows platform. The major downside of Loom is that the macOS version offers more features than Windows. In terms of options, you have share, download, and video speed on the edit page.
#LOOM VS SCREENCASTIFY SOFTWARE#
Like Screencast-O-Matic, Loom is also offered on desktop as a software tool and Chrome extension. The free software does not limit the recording time, but the maximum quality it supports is 720p. The software saves recordings online, so it is not recommended if you have a limited data plan.
![loom vs screencastify loom vs screencastify](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/e6Ql0q_Uu4s/maxresdefault.jpg)
The cloud-based screen recorder is focused on macOS because the macOS version comes with extended features. Watch: Screencast-O-Matic Full Tutorial Editor (premium) The comparison of both the tools is covered in the Screencast-O-Matic vs. The video editor tool is available in both, so you must download the setup to edit videos. The more members are included, the better the savings. The cost for the Team Deluxe plan is $9.5 for a team of 10 members and $17.5 for the Team Premier plan. The team plan also comes in the same variations with some team focused tools. The price for those is $1.65 and $4 per month, respectively. The software comes in two premium variations Solo and Teams. The tool supports both screen and webcam recording simultaneously, and if you are using the free version, the extension is all you need to record. The mobile apps are offered in the paid plan and allow syncing with the desktop editor. The software comes with most of the screen recording tools you need. One of the tools featured on Advance Market Analytics for its huge market cap, the freemium software is available for Windows, macOS, Chromecast and both mobile OSs.